History of jewellery

Ancient world jewellery

Collar known as The Shannongrove Gorget, maker unknown, late Bronze Age (probably 800-700 BC). Museum no. M.35-1948

Collar known as The Shannongrove Gorget, maker unknown, late Bronze Age (probably 800-700 BC). Museum no. M.35-1948. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Jewellery is a universal form of adornment. Jewellery made from shells, stone and bones survives from prehistoric times. It is likely that from an early date it was worn as a protection from the dangers of life or as a mark of status or rank.

In the ancient world the discovery of how to work metals was an important stage in the development of the art of jewellery. Over time, metalworking techniques became more sophisticated and decoration more intricate.

Gold, a rare and highly valued material, was buried with the dead so as to accompany its owner into the afterlife. Much archaeological jewellery comes from tombs and hoards. Sometimes, as with the gold collars from Celtic Ireland which have been found folded in half, it appears people may have followed a ritual for the disposal of jewellery.

Rosette (front view above, rear view below), maker unknown, 530 BC. Museum no. 8839-1863. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Rosette (front view above, rear view below), maker unknown, 530 BC. Museum no. 8839-1863. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Armlet in the form of a snake, maker unknown, AD 1-100. Museum no. 631-1884. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Armlet in the form of a snake, maker unknown, AD 1-100. Museum no. 631-1884. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Pendant, maker unknown, 600BC-500BC. Museum no. M.134-1919. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Pendant, maker unknown, 600BC-500BC. Museum no. M.134-1919. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

    

Medieval jewellery 1200–1500

Pendant, maker unknown, about 1350. Museum no. 216-1874. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Pendant, maker unknown, about 1350. Museum no. 216-1874. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

The jewellery worn in medieval Europe reflected an intensely hierarchical and status-conscious society. Royalty and the nobility wore gold, silver and precious gems. Humbler ranks wore base metals, such as copper or pewter. Colour (provided by precious gems and enamel) and protective power were highly valued.

Until the late 14th century, gems were usually polished rather than cut. Size and lustrous colour determined their value. Enamels - ground glasses fired at high temperature onto a metal surface - allowed goldsmiths to colour their designs on jewellery. They used a range of techniques to create effects never since surpassed.

Some jewels have cryptic or magical inscriptions, believed to protect the wearer.

Diptych Pendant, maker unknown, about 1450-80. Museum no. 213-1874. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Diptych Pendant, maker unknown, about 1450-80. Museum no. 213-1874. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London 
Heart-shaped Brooch, maker unknown, about 1400. Museum no. 86-1899. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Heart-shaped Brooch, maker unknown, about 1400. Museum no. 86-1899. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Ring, maker unknown, 1200-1300. Museum no. M.7-1929. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Ring, maker unknown, 1200-1300. Museum no. M.7-1929. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

 

Renaissance jewellery

Locket known as The Heneage Jewel or The Armada Jewel, painting by Nicholas Hilliard, about 1595. Museum no. M.81-1935. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Locket known as The Heneage Jewel or The Armada Jewel, painting by Nicholas Hilliard, about 1595. Museum no. M.81-1935. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Renaissance jewels shared the age's passion for splendour. Enamels, often covering both sides of the jewel, became more elaborate and colourful. Advances in cutting techniques increased the glitter of stones.

The enormous importance of religion in everyday life could be seen in jewellery, as could earthly power - many spectacular pieces were worn as a display of political strength.

The designs reflect the new-found interest in the classical world, with mythological figures and scenes becoming popular. The ancient art of gem engraving was revived. The inclusion of portraits reflected another cultural trend - an increased artistic awareness of the individual.

Prophylactic pendant, maker unknown, about 1540-60. Museum no. M.242-1975, given by Dame Joan Evans. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Prophylactic pendant, maker unknown, about 1540-60. Museum no. M.242-1975, given by Dame Joan Evans. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Ring, maker unknown, setting 15th century, centre 2nd century BC-1st century BC. Museum no. 724-1871. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Ring, maker unknown, setting 15th century, centre 2nd century BC-1st century BC. Museum no. 724-1871. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

 

17th-century jewellery

Necklace with Sapphire Pendant, bow about 1660, chain and pendant probably 18-1900. Museum no. M.95-1909. Bequeathed by Lady Alma-Tadema. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Necklace with Sapphire Pendant, bow about 1660, chain and pendant probably 18-1900. Museum no. M.95-1909. Bequeathed by Lady Alma-Tadema. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

By the mid-17th century, changes in fashion had introduced new styles of jewellery. While dark fabrics required elaborate gold jewellery, the new softer pastel shades became graceful backdrops for gemstones and pearls. Expanding global trade made gemstones ever more available. Advances in cutting techniques increased the sparkle of gemstones in candlelight.

The most impressive jewels were often large bodice or breast ornaments, which had to be pinned or stitched to stiff dress fabrics. The swirling foliate decoration of the jewels shows new enthusiasm for bow motifs and botanical ornaments.



Breast ornament, enamelled gold set with diamonds, about 1620-30. Museum no. M.143-1975. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Breast ornament, enamelled gold set with diamonds, about 1620-30. Museum no. M.143-1975. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Gimmel ring, enamelled gold set with a diamond, about 1600-50. Museum no. M.224-1975. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Gimmel ring, enamelled gold set with a diamond, about 1600-50. Museum no. M.224-1975. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Pomander, maker unknown, 1600-50. M.105:1 to 8-1939. Given by Miss Mabel M.Boore. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Pomander, maker unknown, 1600-50. M.105:1 to 8-1939. Given by Miss Mabel M.Boore. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

 

18th-century jewellery

Sword, mark of James Morisset, 1798-9. Museum no. 274-1, 2-1869. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Sword, mark of James Morisset, 1798-9. Museum no. 274-1, 2-1869. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

The end of the previous century had seen the development of the brilliant-cut with its multiple facets. Diamonds sparkled as never before and came to dominate jewellery design. Frequently mounted in silver to enhance the stone's white colour, magnificent sets of diamond jewels were essential for court life. The largest were worn on the bodice, while smaller ornaments could be scattered over an outfit.

Owing to its high intrinsic value, little diamond jewellery from this period survives. Owners often sold it or re-set the gems into more fashionable designs.

Bridal crown (brudkrona), 18th or 19th century. Museum no. 1354-1873

19th-century jewellery

Spray ornament, maker unknown, about 1850. Museum no. M.115-1951. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Spray ornament, maker unknown, about 1850. Museum no. M.115-1951. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

The 19th century was a period of huge industrial and social change, but in jewellery design the focus was often on the past. In the first decades classical styles were popular, evoking the glories of ancient Greece and Rome. This interest in antiquities was stimulated by fresh archaeological discoveries. Goldsmiths attempted to revive ancient techniques and made jewellery that imitated, or was in the style of, archaeological jewellery.

There was also an interest in jewels inspired by the Medieval and Renaissance periods. It is a testament to the period's eclectic nature that jewellers such as the Castellani and Giuliano worked in archaeological and historical styles at the same time.

Naturalistic jewellery, decorated with clearly recognisable flowers and fruit, was also popular for much of this period. These motifs first became fashionable in the early years of the century, with the widespread interest in botany and the influence of Romantic poets such as Wordsworth. By the 1850s the delicate early designs had given way to more extravagant and complex compositions of flowers and foliage. At the same time, flowers were used to express love and friendship. The colours in nature were matched by coloured gemstones, and a 'language of flowers' spelt out special messages. In contrast with earlier periods, the more elaborate jewellery was worn almost exclusively by women.

Brooch with cameo of Queen Victoria, by Félix Dafrique; cameo by Paul Lebas (active 1829-70)

Arts & crafts jewellery

Pendant-brooch (detail), designed by C.R. Ashbee and made by the Guild of Handicraft, About 1900. Museum no. M.31-2005. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Pendant-brooch (detail), designed by C.R. Ashbee and made by the Guild of Handicraft, About 1900. Museum no. M.31-2005. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Developing in the last years of the 19th century, the Arts and Crafts movement was based on a profound unease with the industrialised world. Its jewellers rejected the machine-led factory system - by now the source of most affordable pieces - and instead focused on hand-crafting individual jewels. This process, they believed, would improve the soul of the workman as well as the end design.

Arts and Crafts jewellers avoided large, faceted stones, relying instead on the natural beauty of cabochon gems. They replaced the repetition and regularity of mainstream settings with curving or figurative designs, often with a symbolic meaning.


Buckle and Belt Tag, Henry Wilson 1864 –1934, probably made in the workshop of Henry Wilson, about 1905. Museum no. M.5:1&2-2002. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Buckle and Belt Tag, Henry Wilson 1864 –1934, probably made in the workshop of Henry Wilson, about 1905. Museum no. M.5:1&2-2002. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Tiara, Henry Wilson (1864 - 1934), about 1908. Museum no. CIRC.362-1958. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Tiara, Henry Wilson (1864 - 1934), about 1908. Museum no. CIRC.362-1958. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Pendant and necklace, designed by C.R. Ashbee, made by the Guild of Handicraft, 1901– 2. Museum no. M.23-1965. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Pendant and necklace, designed by C.R. Ashbee, made by the Guild of Handicraft, 1901– 2. Museum no. M.23-1965. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

 

Art Nouveau jewellery and the Garland style 1895–1910

Hair ornament, made by Philippe Wolfers, 1905-7. Museum no. M.11-1962

Hair ornament, made by Philippe Wolfers, 1905-7. Museum no. M.11-1962. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

The Art Nouveau style caused a dramatic shift in jewellery design, reaching a peak around 1900 when it triumphed at the Paris International Exhibition.

Its followers created sinuous, organic pieces whose undercurrents of eroticism and death were a world away from the floral motifs of earlier generations. Art Nouveau jewellers like René Lalique also distanced themselves from conventional precious stones and put greater emphasis on the subtle effects of materials such as glass, horn and enamel.

However, the style's radical look was not for everyone or for every occasion. Superb diamond jewellery was made in the 'garland style', a highly creative re-interpretation of 18th- and early 19th-century designs.

Brooch, Charles Desrosiers, 1901. Museum no. 957-1901. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Brooch, Charles Desrosiers, 1901. Museum no. 957-1901. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London



Art Deco jewellery to the 1950s

Commemorative Brooch, 1937. Museum no. M.115-1993

Commemorative Brooch, 1937. Museum no. M.115-1993. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Although buffeted by cycles of boom, depression and war, jewellery design between the 1920s and 1950s maintained both innovation and glamour. Sharp, geometric patterns celebrated the machine age, while exotic creations inspired by the Near and Far East hinted that jewellery fashions were truly international. New York now rivalled Paris as a centre for fashion, and European jewellery houses could expect to sell to, as well as buy from, the Indian subcontinent.

Dense concentrations of gemstones are characteristic of Art Deco jewellery. From about 1933 gold returned to fashion, partly because it was cheaper than platinum.

Artists and designers from other fields also became involved in jewellery design. Their work foreshadows the new directions jewellery would take.


Contemporary jewellery

Bracelet, designed and made by Gerd Rothmann, 1970. Museum no. M.30. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Bracelet, designed and made by Gerd Rothmann, 1970. Museum no. M.30&A-1990. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Since the 1960s the boundaries of jewellery have been continually redefined. Conventions have been challenged by successive generations of independent jewellers, often educated at art college and immersed in radical ideas.

New technologies and non-precious materials, including plastics, paper and textiles, have overturned the notions of status traditionally implicit in jewellery.

Avant-garde artist-jewellers have explored the interaction of jewellery with the body, pushing the boundaries of scale and wearability to the limits. Jewellery has developed into wearable art. The debate on its relationship to Fine Art continues.

Bracelet, Kazumi Nagano, 2006. Museum no. M.228-2007. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Bracelet, Kazumi Nagano, 2006. Museum no. M.228-2007. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London/Kazumi Nagano

Ring, designed and made by Philip Sajet, 1992-3. Museum no. M.39-2007. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Ring, designed and made by Philip Sajet, 1992-3. Museum no. M.39-2007. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

Brooch, designed and engraved by Malcolm Appleby, made by Roger Doyle, 1975. Museum no. M.314-1977. ©Victoria and Albert Museum, London

Brooch, designed and engraved by Malcolm Appleby, made by Roger Doyle, 1975. Museum no. M.314-1977. © Victoria & Albert Museum, London

A gift in your will

You may not have thought of including a gift to a museum in your will, but the V&A is a charity and legacies form an important source of funding for our work. It is not just the great collectors and the wealthy who leave legacies to the V&A. Legacies of all sizes, large and small, make a real difference to what we can do and your support can help ensure that future generations enjoy the V&A as much as you have.

More

Shop online

Traditional Jewellery: In Nineteenth-Century Europe (Hardback)

Traditional Jewellery: In Nineteenth-Century Europe (Hardback)

Although less well-known today, European jewellery - jewellery worn with traditional or national costume - was highly fashionable in nineteenth-centur…

Buy now

Event - Classical Inspirations: The Timeless Legacy of Castellani Jewellery

Thu 04 July 2013 15:00

The rise of the Castellani, a nineteenth century Roman family of goldsmiths and jewellers, is one of the most fascinating stories in the long history of jewellery and the luxury arts.

Book online